Home › Lawsuits › Kia and Hyundai vehicle theft settlement
Kia and Hyundai vehicle theft settlement lawsuit
Approved but not effective. Final approval was granted on October 1, 2024; appeals followed, and the administrator states settlement payments cannot be made until those appeals are resolved. Payment issuance is listed as TBD. A settlement for owners of 2011-2022 Kia and Hyundai vehicles built without engine immobilizers, which a viral social-media method made easy to steal. The court approved it on October 1, 2024, but appeals were filed and the administrator states payments cannot be made until they are resolved.
The docket record
- Actions pending
- 1000
- Total actions, historical
- 117
- Change, 3 months
- 0
- Change, 12 months
- −12(-10.7%)
- Docket
- MDL No. 3052
- Court
- Central District of California
- Transferee judge
- James V. SelnaSr. District Judge
- Last report
- September 1, 2026
Source: JPML “Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending,” report dated September 1, 2026 · first in our series Jan 2024
Month-by-month figures, Jan 2024 to Sep 2026
| Report date | Actions pending | Change | Total, historical | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 1, 2026 | 100 | 0 | 117 | |
| August 3, 2026 | 100 | 0 | 117 | |
| July 1, 2026 | 100 | 0 | 117 | |
| June 1, 2026 | 100 | 0 | 117 | |
| May 1, 2026 | 100 | 0 | 117 | |
| April 1, 2026 | 100 | 0 | 117 | |
| March 2, 2026 | 100 | 0 | 117 | |
| February 2, 2026 | 100 | −1 | 117 | |
| January 5, 2026 | 101 | +1 | 117 | |
| December 2, 2025 | 100 | 0 | 116 | |
| November 3, 2025 | 100 | +2 | 116 | |
| October 1, 2025 | 98 | −14 | 114 | |
| September 2, 2025 | 112 | +2 | 112 | |
| August 1, 2025 | 110 | +1 | 110 | |
| July 1, 2025 | 109 | 0 | 109 | |
| June 2, 2025 | 109 | 0 | 109 | |
| May 1, 2025 | 109 | 0 | 109 | |
| April 1, 2025 | 109 | +1 | 109 | |
| March 3, 2025 | 108 | 0 | 108 | |
| February 3, 2025 | 108 | 0 | 108 | |
| January 2, 2025 | 108 | 0 | 108 | |
| December 2, 2024 | 108 | +1 | 108 | |
| October 1, 2024 | 107 | +5 | 107 | |
| September 3, 2024 | 102 | +2 | 102 | |
| August 1, 2024 | 100 | +1 | 100 | |
| July 1, 2024 | 99 | +1 | 99 | |
| June 3, 2024 | 98 | +1 | 98 | |
| May 1, 2024 | 97 | 0 | 97 | |
| April 1, 2024 | 97 | +1 | 97 | |
| March 1, 2024 | 96 | +2 | 96 | |
| February 1, 2024 | 94 | 0 | 94 | |
| January 2, 2024 | 94 | 94 |
Full docket title: IN RE: Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. Programmatic record page: MDL 3052.
Kia and Hyundai vehicle theft settlement update — September 2026
What changed this month: in the September 1, 2026 report, MDL 3052 held at 100 pending actions, unchanged from the previous report. Figures come from the Judicial Panel's own monthly report and are restated here each month.
This is the answer to almost every question asked about this settlement, and it is not the answer most people expect. The Central District of California granted final approval on October 1, 2024. Several appeals were then filed. The court-appointed administrator's own statement is that "the settlement has not become effective and settlement payments cannot be made until the appeals are resolved", and its Important Dates table lists Payment Issuance as "TBD", to occur after all court appeals have been resolved and the settlement becomes effective. The claim submission deadline passed on April 28, 2025, and the exclusion and objection deadlines passed on May 3, 2024. So the position is: the class is closed, the settlement is approved, and the money is held up by appellate process with no published date. The underlying MDL is separately still very much alive, with 100 actions pending in the Central District of California on the Judicial Panel's September 1, 2026 report.
Sources: Kia Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator site · Hyundai Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator … · Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft MDL case page, No. 8:22-ML-3052… · Transfer Order, In re: Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Litigati…; full list at the end of this page.
Official claims administrator: www.kiatheftsettlement.com/ · claim deadline published as April 28, 2025. Claims are filed there, never here.
What the lawsuits are about
Certain Kia and Hyundai models built between 2011 and 2022 were sold without an engine immobilizer, a standard anti-theft component that prevents an engine starting unless it detects the correct key. In 2022 a method for defeating the ignition on those cars using little more than a USB cable spread on social media, and thefts of the affected models rose sharply across the United States.
Owners, lessees, insurers and a number of cities sued. The consumer cases were centralised in the Central District of California as MDL 3052, In re: Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:22-ML-3052 JVS(KESx), before Judge James V. Selna.
The consumer class settlement covers people who bought or leased an affected vehicle in the United States, including Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam. The administrator describes benefits that include a software upgrade for eligible vehicles and, subject to proof requirements, compensation for damage arising from the theft or attempted theft of a class vehicle. No party has been found liable; the settlement was voluntary.
Not everything in MDL 3052 is covered by that settlement. The docket also carries claims brought by subrogating insurers and by governmental entities, which the court has been managing on separate tracks. That is part of why the MDL still shows a large number of pending actions even though the consumer class settled.
Injuries named in the filings
- Theft of a class vehicle
- Damage caused by an attempted theft of a class vehicle
- Out-of-pocket losses connected to theft or attempted theft, subject to the settlement's proof requirements
- Diminished value and increased insurance cost alleged to follow from the missing immobilizer
Principal defendants: Kia America, Inc.; Hyundai Motor America; Kia Corporation and Hyundai Motor Company.
Sources: Kia Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator site · Hyundai Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator … · Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft MDL case page, No. 8:22-ML-3052… · Transfer Order, In re: Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Litigati…; full list at the end of this page.
Who the filings say qualifies
The class definition and the claim deadline are both fixed and closed. These are the terms that decided who could file, which is what someone waiting on a payment needs in order to know where they stand.
- Purchased or leased a class vehicle in the United States, including Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam.
- The vehicle is a 2011-2022 model year Kia or Hyundai on the administrator's eligible-vehicle list, built with an insert-and-turn steel key ignition and no factory engine immobilizer. The Kia list includes Forte, K5, Optima, Rio, Sedona, Seltos, Sorento, Soul and Sportage across various years; the Hyundai list is published on the parallel Hyundai site.
- A claim submitted by the deadline of April 28, 2025. Closed.
- Not excluded from the class — the exclusion deadline passed on May 3, 2024, as did the objection deadline.
- For theft-loss compensation specifically, the settlement imposes proof requirements; the software upgrade benefit is separate and depends on whether a particular vehicle is eligible for it.
- No lawyer is needed and none can add you to the class now. Payment questions go to the administrator.
Source: Kia Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator site.
These are the criteria in the public record, not a promise about any individual case. A law firm evaluates each case on its own facts, and limitations periods vary by state.
There is no case review to request here.
This settlement is closed to new claims and the court-appointed administrator is handling payment directly. No law firm can add you now, and we are not collecting details for a litigation nobody can join. If you already filed a claim, the administrator is the only place that can tell you where it stands — www.kiatheftsettlement.com. You can get an alert when the record changes.
Key dates
- The Judicial Panel centralises the Kia and Hyundai vehicle theft cases as MDL 3052 in the Central District of California. source
- Exclusion deadline and objection deadline for the consumer class settlement. source
- Settlement fairness hearing. source
- The court grants final approval of the consumer class settlement. Several appeals are subsequently filed. source
- Claim submission deadline. Closed. source
Questions people ask
When is the Kia and Hyundai theft settlement payout date?
There is no date. The administrator lists Payment Issuance as "TBD" and states that payments will be issued only after all court appeals have been resolved and the settlement becomes effective. Its standing update says that although the court granted final approval on October 1, 2024, several appeals were filed, and "at this time the settlement has not become effective and settlement payments cannot be made until the appeals are resolved." That was still the position on both the Kia and Hyundai administrator sites when we read them on September 11, 2026. Any specific payout date you see quoted for this settlement is not coming from the administrator.
Why has the Kia and Hyundai settlement not paid out yet?
Because approval and effectiveness are two different things. A district court can approve a class settlement, but if objectors appeal, the settlement generally cannot take effect until the appeals are resolved — otherwise money would be distributed that an appellate court might later unwind. Final approval came on October 1, 2024 and appeals followed. Until they conclude, the administrator cannot issue payments, regardless of how long ago you filed your claim.
Can I still file a Kia or Hyundai theft settlement claim?
No. The claim submission deadline was April 28, 2025 and it has passed. The exclusion and objection deadlines passed earlier, on May 3, 2024. If you did not file by the deadline there is nothing to join now, and no law firm can add you to a closed class.
Which Kia and Hyundai vehicles are covered?
Broadly, 2011-2022 model year vehicles fitted with a traditional insert-and-turn steel key ignition and no factory engine immobilizer. On the Kia side the administrator's list includes the Forte, K5, Optima, Rio, Sedona, Seltos, Sorento, Soul and Sportage over various model years; Hyundai's eligible models are listed on the parallel Hyundai administrator site. Check your specific model year against the administrator's own list rather than assuming, because coverage varies year by year within the same model.
Is there one settlement or two?
One settlement, two websites. The consumer class settlement covers both brands under the same case, No. 8:22-ML-3052 in the Central District of California, but the administrator runs a Kia-facing site and a Hyundai-facing site. Both carry the same status update. Use the one matching your vehicle.
How do I check my Kia or Hyundai settlement claim status?
Through the administrator, at kiatheftsettlement.com or hyundaitheftsettlement.com depending on your vehicle. They hold the claim records. We do not host the claim process and cannot look up a claim for you.
What did the lawsuit say Kia and Hyundai did wrong?
That they sold vehicles without an engine immobilizer — an anti-theft device that prevents the engine starting without the correct key — which allegedly made those cars far easier to steal once the method spread on social media. The claims were framed as design defect and as marketing and sales practices claims. No party has been found liable for anything alleged; the parties settled voluntarily to avoid further litigation.
Is the Kia and Hyundai MDL over?
No. The consumer class settled, but MDL 3052 was still listed on the Judicial Panel's September 1, 2026 report with 100 actions pending in the Central District of California, out of 117 historically. The docket also carries insurer subrogation claims and claims by governmental entities, which the court has managed on separate tracks from the consumer class.
Sources: Kia Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator site · Hyundai Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator … · Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft MDL case page, No. 8:22-ML-3052… · Transfer Order, In re: Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Litigati…; full list at the end of this page.
Track this docket
We re-read the JPML report on the first business day of each month. Get an email when this record changes: case count, status, or a settlement development.
Sources
- U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, “Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending,” monthly reports January 2, 2024 to September 1, 2026. Transferee court: Central District of California, James V. Selna.
- Kia Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator site, Settlement Administrator, appointed by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Accessed September 11, 2026.
- Hyundai Vehicle Theft Settlement, official administrator site, Settlement Administrator, appointed by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Accessed September 11, 2026.
- Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft MDL case page, No. 8:22-ML-3052 JVS(KESx), U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Accessed September 11, 2026.
- Transfer Order, In re: Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Litigation, MDL No. 3052, U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Accessed September 11, 2026.
Settlement Record is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. We may be compensated if you request a case review and are referred to a law firm or intake partner. Settlement Record is not affiliated with any court, agency, defendant or law firm named on this page.