Every federal MDL from the Judicial Panel's own reports · updated September 1, 2026Find your lawsuit →
Settlement Record

HomeLawsuitsAT&T data breach lawsuit

AT&T data breach lawsuit

SettledStatus as of September 3, 2026 · MDL No. 3114

Combined class settlement over two AT&T data breaches; claim window closed December 18, 2025; Final Approval Hearing held January 15, 2026; the court has not yet ruled on final approval as of the settlement website's most recent posted update. Lawsuits over two separate 2024 AT&T data breaches (a March 2024 dark-web posting of 2019-era customer data and a July 2024 breach of call/text records) were consolidated in MDL No. 3114; a combined class settlement was preliminarily approved, the claim window closed December 18, 2025, and the court has not yet issued final approval.

The docket record

Actions pending
140+1(+0.7%)
Total actions, historical
141
Change, 3 months
+1(+0.7%)
Change, 12 months
+11(+8.5%)
Docket
MDL No. 3114
Court
Northern District of Texas
Transferee judge
Sidney A. FitzwaterSr. District Judge

Source: JPML “Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending,” report dated September 1, 2026 · first in our series Jul 2024

Actions pending in MDL 3114, by monthly JPML report050100150200Jan 2024Jul 2024Feb 2025Aug 2025Feb 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026
Actions pending on each monthly JPML report, Jan 2024 to Sep 2026. Gaps are months the report omitted the figure.

Month-by-month figures, Jan 2024 to Sep 2026

Report dateActions pendingChangeTotal, historicalReport
September 1, 2026140+1141PDF
August 3, 20261390140PDF
July 1, 20261390140PDF
June 1, 2026139+1140PDF
May 1, 20261380139PDF
April 1, 2026138+1139PDF
March 2, 2026137+1138PDF
February 2, 2026136+2137PDF
January 5, 2026134+1135PDF
December 2, 20251330134PDF
November 3, 20251330134PDF
October 1, 2025133+4134PDF
September 2, 2025129+16130PDF
August 1, 2025113+2113PDF
July 1, 20251110111PDF
June 2, 2025111+15111PDF
May 1, 202596+296PDF
April 1, 202594094PDF
March 3, 202594+794PDF
February 3, 202587087PDF
January 2, 202587+887PDF
December 2, 202479+879PDF
October 1, 202471071PDF
September 3, 202471+171PDF
August 1, 202470+470PDF
July 1, 20246666PDF
June 3, 2024not listedPDF
May 1, 2024not listedPDF
April 1, 2024not listedPDF
March 1, 2024not listedPDF
February 1, 2024not listedPDF
January 2, 2024not listedPDF

Full docket title: IN RE: AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation. Programmatic record page: MDL 3114.

Where it stands

This MDL consolidates lawsuits over two separate AT&T data incidents: the 'AT&T 1 Data Incident,' a data set with 2019-era customer information (names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, account passcodes, billing account numbers, and in some cases Social Security numbers) that AT&T announced on March 30, 2024, had appeared on the dark web; and the 'AT&T 2 Data Incident,' a separate breach AT&T announced on July 12, 2024, involving call and text metadata (numbers contacted, interaction counts, aggregate call durations, and for a subset of records, cell site identifiers) illegally downloaded from an AT&T workspace on a third-party cloud platform hosted by Snowflake, Inc. The AT&T 1 lawsuits were centralized into this MDL (No. 3114) before Judge Ada E. Brown in the Northern District of Texas in June 2024; the AT&T 2 lawsuits were centralized separately into MDL No. 3126 before Judge Brian Morris in the District of Montana in October 2024. In March 2025 the parties agreed to settle both sets of claims together in the Northern District of Texas, and on May 30, 2025 plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint. The court preliminarily approved the combined settlement (Dkt. 298), later amending the deadline schedule on October 3, 2025 (Dkt. 342). Under the amended schedule, the opt-out and objection deadline was November 17, 2025, and the deadline to submit a Claim Form was December 18, 2025; both have passed and the claim form is no longer available. The court held a Final Approval Hearing on January 15, 2026. As of the settlement website's April 23, 2026 posted update, the court had not yet decided whether to grant final approval, and the settlement administrator (Kroll Settlement Administration LLC) was continuing to review submitted claims. No payments will go out until final approval is granted and any appeals are resolved. On August 17, 2026, the JPML reassigned pretrial proceedings from Judge Brown to Senior District Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater. As of the JPML's report dated September 1, 2026, 140 actions were pending in MDL No. 3114.

Sources: Pending Multidistrict Litigation Dockets by Actions Pendi… · In re: AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation… · MDL 3:24-md-03114, In re AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security… · Notice: Contact information for Kroll Settlement Administ…; full list at the end of this page.

Official claims administrator: www.telecomdatasettlement.com/ · claim deadline published as December 18, 2025. Claims are filed there, never here.

What the lawsuits are about

AT&T disclosed two separate data incidents in 2024. On March 30, 2024, AT&T announced that a data set containing AT&T-specific customer fields, drawn from information dating to 2019 or earlier, had been posted on the dark web; the compromised fields could include names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, AT&T account passcodes, billing account numbers, and for some customers, Social Security numbers ('AT&T 1 Data Incident'). Then, on July 12, 2024, AT&T announced a second, unrelated incident: certain call and text metadata for nearly all AT&T wireless customers had been illegally downloaded from an AT&T workspace hosted on a third-party cloud platform operated by Snowflake, Inc. ('AT&T 2 Data Incident'). That data reportedly included phone numbers customers interacted with, counts and aggregate durations of those interactions, and, for a smaller subset of records, cell site identification numbers tied to the interactions. Plaintiffs in both sets of lawsuits allege AT&T failed to adequately secure customer data and did not provide timely notice; these are allegations from plaintiffs' complaints, not proven facts, and AT&T has not admitted liability or wrongdoing.

Lawsuits over the AT&T 1 Data Incident were filed in state and federal courts nationwide and, in June 2024, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized the federal actions into MDL No. 3114, captioned In re: AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, assigning the litigation to Judge Ada E. Brown in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. Lawsuits over the separate AT&T 2 Data Incident were centralized into a different MDL, No. 3126, In Re Snowflake, Inc. Data Breach Litigation, before Judge Brian Morris in the District of Montana in October 2024. In March 2025, the parties in both sets of actions agreed to resolve them together as a single combined settlement in the Northern District of Texas, and on May 30, 2025, plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint asserting claims arising from both data incidents.

The court preliminarily approved the combined settlement and, on October 3, 2025, granted a joint motion extending the settlement's remaining deadlines (Dkt. 342): the deadline to opt out or object was set for November 17, 2025, and the deadline to submit a Claim Form was set for December 18, 2025. Both deadlines have passed. The court held a Final Approval Hearing on January 15, 2026, in Dallas, and as of the settlement website's April 23, 2026 update had not yet ruled on final approval; the settlement administrator continued reviewing submitted claims in the meantime. On August 17, 2026, the JPML reassigned the MDL from Judge Brown to Senior District Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater for continued pretrial proceedings. As of the JPML's report dated September 1, 2026, 140 actions remained pending in MDL No. 3114.

Injuries named in the filings

  • Increased risk of identity theft and fraud following exposure of personal information (names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and account credentials) in the AT&T 1 Data Incident
  • Emotional distress and time/money spent monitoring accounts and credit as a result of the AT&T 1 and/or AT&T 2 Data Incidents
  • Documented out-of-pocket losses (e.g., costs tied to identity theft or fraud) that plaintiffs allege are traceable to one or both data incidents
  • Invasion of privacy from unauthorized access to and download of call and text interaction records in the AT&T 2 Data Incident

Principal defendants: AT&T Inc.; AT&T Mobility LLC; AT&T Corporation; DirecTV, LLC; AT&T Services, Inc.; Cricket Wireless LLC.

Sources: Pending Multidistrict Litigation Dockets by Actions Pendi… · In re: AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation… · MDL 3:24-md-03114, In re AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security… · Notice: Contact information for Kroll Settlement Administ…; full list at the end of this page.

Who the filings say qualifies

Illustration of a person seen from behind holding a phone showing a starburst ad, with a ruled checklist document on the table in front of them
Compare the ad to the filings' own criteria before you fill in anyone's form.

Who qualifies is defined by the settlement's two class definitions, published in the settlement notice and FAQ approved by the court (Kroll Settlement Administration, telecomdatasettlement.com). There are two settlement classes, and a person can be in both.

  • AT&T 1 Settlement Class: any living person in the United States whose data elements (some combination of name, address, telephone number, email address, date of birth, account passcode, billing account number, or Social Security number) were included in the AT&T 1 Data Incident announced March 30, 2024
  • AT&T 2 Settlement Class: any AT&T account owner, or line/end user (including customers of an MVNO carrier that runs on the AT&T network), whose data elements (phone numbers, interaction counts, aggregate call/text durations, or in a subset of cases cell site identifiers) were involved in the AT&T 2 Data Incident announced July 12, 2024
  • A person included in both classes is an 'Overlap Settlement Class Member' and is eligible for benefits under both
  • Excluded from either class: AT&T and its officers/directors/affiliates; the presiding judge and judicial staff; anyone who already released claims relating to the applicable incident before final approval; and anyone who timely opted out by the November 17, 2025 deadline
  • To receive a Documented Loss Cash Payment (up to $5,000 for AT&T 1, up to $2,500 for AT&T 2) rather than a flat pro rata Tier payment, a claimant had to submit reasonable, non-self-prepared documentation (such as receipts) showing losses fairly traceable to the relevant incident and incurred on or after that incident through the date of claim submission
  • The claim filing deadline was December 18, 2025; the settlement website states the claim form is no longer available

Source: AT&T Data Incident Settlement, Frequently Asked Questions (Kroll Settlement Administration LLC, court-authorized settlement website for MDL No. 3:24-md-03114-E).

These are the criteria in the public record, not a promise about any individual case. A law firm evaluates each case on its own facts, and limitations periods vary by state.

Want a case review for the AT&T data breach?

Case reviews for this litigation are not open through this site yet. Leave your details and we will pass them to a participating firm or intake partner only if one accepts this litigation, and only with the consent below.

Key dates

  1. AT&T announces the AT&T 1 Data Incident: a data set with 2019-era customer information posted on the dark web, affecting current and former customers. source
  2. The JPML centralizes AT&T 1 Data Incident lawsuits into MDL No. 3114, assigning the litigation to Judge Ada E. Brown in the Northern District of Texas. source
  3. AT&T announces the separate AT&T 2 Data Incident: call and text metadata illegally downloaded from an AT&T workspace on a third-party cloud platform hosted by Snowflake, Inc. source
  4. Plaintiffs file a Consolidated Class Action Complaint covering both the AT&T 1 and AT&T 2 Data Incidents, after the parties agreed in March 2025 to settle both sets of claims together in the Northern District of Texas. source
  5. Court grants a joint motion amending the Preliminary Approval Order, setting the opt-out/objection deadline for November 17, 2025 and the Claim Form deadline for December 18, 2025. source
  6. Deadline to submit a Claim Form for a Settlement Class Member Benefit; the settlement website states claim forms are no longer available. source
  7. Court holds the Final Approval Hearing in Dallas to consider whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. source
  8. The JPML reassigns the litigation from Judge Ada E. Brown to Senior District Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater for continued pretrial proceedings. source
  9. JPML's monthly pending-actions report lists 140 actions pending in MDL No. 3114 before Judge Fitzwater in the Northern District of Texas. source

Questions people ask

Is the AT&T data breach lawsuit still active, or has it settled?

Both incidents are covered by a combined class settlement that the court has preliminarily approved. The court held a Final Approval Hearing on January 15, 2026, but had not yet issued a final ruling as of the settlement website's most recent posted update. The claim filing window closed on December 18, 2025.

How many AT&T data breaches does this settlement cover?

Two separate incidents: the 'AT&T 1 Data Incident,' a set of 2019-era customer data posted on the dark web that AT&T disclosed on March 30, 2024, and the 'AT&T 2 Data Incident,' call and text metadata taken from a third-party cloud platform (associated with Snowflake, Inc.) that AT&T disclosed on July 12, 2024. They were litigated in two different MDLs before the parties agreed to settle both together.

Can I still file a claim in the AT&T data breach settlement?

No. The deadline to submit a Claim Form was December 18, 2025, and the official settlement website states claim forms are no longer available. Anyone with questions about a claim already filed can contact the settlement administrator, Kroll Settlement Administration LLC, at (833) 890-4930.

How much money will AT&T data breach claimants get?

The settlement website states this amount is unknown; payments depend on how many valid claims are received, court-approved attorneys' fees and costs, and settlement administration expenses. Eligible claimants could seek either a Documented Loss Cash Payment (up to $5,000 for the AT&T 1 incident or up to $2,500 for the AT&T 2 incident, with proof of loss) or a pro rata Tier payment from the applicable Net Settlement Fund; no total dollar figure for either fund has been published.

Who administers the AT&T data breach settlement?

Kroll Settlement Administration LLC, appointed by the court, administers the settlement through the official website telecomdatasettlement.com, described on that site as 'the only authorized website for this case.'

When will AT&T data breach settlement payments go out?

The settlement website states that distribution will begin only after the court grants final approval, the time for any appeals has expired, and all Claim Forms have been reviewed. As of the site's most recent posted update, the court had not yet ruled on final approval, so no payment date has been set.

Sources: Pending Multidistrict Litigation Dockets by Actions Pendi… · In re: AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation… · MDL 3:24-md-03114, In re AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security… · Notice: Contact information for Kroll Settlement Administ…; full list at the end of this page.

Track this docket

We re-read the JPML report on the first business day of each month. Get an email when this record changes: case count, status, or a settlement development.

Sources

  1. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, “Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending,” monthly reports July 1, 2024 to September 1, 2026. Transferee court: Northern District of Texas, Sidney A. Fitzwater.
  2. Pending Multidistrict Litigation Dockets by Actions Pending, Report Date 9/1/2026, U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Accessed September 3, 2026.
  3. In re: AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL No. 3114, Transfer Order (tag-along transfer), U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Accessed September 3, 2026.
  4. MDL 3:24-md-03114, In re AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (case page), U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas. Accessed September 3, 2026.
  5. Notice: Contact information for Kroll Settlement Administration LLC (Dkt. 58), identifying telecomdatasettlement.com as the only authorized settlement website, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas. Accessed September 3, 2026.
  6. Order Granting Joint Motion to Amend Preliminary Approval Order to Extend Certain Deadlines (Dkt. 342), U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas. Accessed September 3, 2026.
  7. Order Reassigning Litigation (MDL No. 3114, to Judge Sidney A. Fitzwater), U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Accessed September 3, 2026.
  8. AT&T Data Incident Settlement — official settlement website (home page, April 23, 2026 update), Kroll Settlement Administration LLC (court-authorized settlement administrator). Accessed September 3, 2026.
  9. AT&T Data Incident Settlement — Frequently Asked Questions, Kroll Settlement Administration LLC (court-authorized settlement administrator). Accessed September 3, 2026.

Settlement Record is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. We may be compensated if you request a case review and are referred to a law firm or intake partner. Settlement Record is not affiliated with any court, agency, defendant or law firm named on this page.

Before you fill out anyone's form

Read the record before you read the ad.

Every lawsuit on this site is a docket the Judicial Panel publishes. Check the count, the status and who the filings cover, then decide who to talk to.

Free · public court data · no account.

Three things to check first

  1. Is the lawsuit real? Every federal MDL is on the Judicial Panel's monthly report. If a docket number is on our register, the litigation exists; if it settled or was dismissed, the record says so.

  2. Who do the filings say qualifies? The master complaint and the court's plaintiff fact sheet define the injuries and exposures at issue. We quote those, not an ad.

  3. Where is the official form? For settled class actions, the court-appointed administrator runs the claims. We link to it and never host a claim form ourselves.

Public court data, dated and sourced. Not a law firm, not legal advice.