Home › Lawsuits › Depo-Provera lawsuit
Depo-Provera lawsuit
Global settlement reached; court appointed a settlement administrator on August 5, 2026, with registration expected to run through November 2026. Lawsuits over the injectable birth control Depo-Provera allege it caused intracranial meningioma brain tumors; a global settlement was reached in June 2026.
The docket record
- Actions pending
- 6,403+109(+1.7%)
- Total actions, historical
- 6,510
- Change, 3 months
- +895(+16.2%)
- Change, 12 months
- +5,597(+694.4%)
- Docket
- MDL No. 3140
- Court
- Northern District of Florida
- Transferee judge
- M. Casey RodgersU.S. District Judge
- Last report
- September 1, 2026
Source: JPML “Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending,” report dated September 1, 2026 · first in our series Mar 2025
Month-by-month figures, Jan 2024 to Sep 2026
| Report date | Actions pending | Change | Total, historical | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 1, 2026 | 6,403 | +109 | 6,510 | |
| August 3, 2026 | 6,294 | +464 | 6,394 | |
| July 1, 2026 | 5,830 | +322 | 5,916 | |
| June 1, 2026 | 5,508 | +1,739 | 5,590 | |
| May 1, 2026 | 3,769 | +279 | 3,835 | |
| April 1, 2026 | 3,490 | +391 | 3,547 | |
| March 2, 2026 | 3,099 | +1,001 | 3,155 | |
| February 2, 2026 | 2,098 | +346 | 2,123 | |
| January 5, 2026 | 1,752 | +282 | 1,775 | |
| December 2, 2025 | 1,470 | +245 | 1,492 | |
| November 3, 2025 | 1,225 | +3 | 1,244 | |
| October 1, 2025 | 1,222 | +416 | 1,241 | |
| September 2, 2025 | 806 | +256 | 820 | |
| August 1, 2025 | 550 | +115 | 557 | |
| July 1, 2025 | 435 | +87 | 440 | |
| June 2, 2025 | 348 | +59 | 350 | |
| May 1, 2025 | 289 | +159 | 291 | |
| April 1, 2025 | 130 | +52 | 131 | |
| March 3, 2025 | 78 | 78 | ||
| February 3, 2025 | not listed | |||
| January 2, 2025 | not listed | |||
| December 2, 2024 | not listed | |||
| October 1, 2024 | not listed | |||
| September 3, 2024 | not listed | |||
| August 1, 2024 | not listed | |||
| July 1, 2024 | not listed | |||
| June 3, 2024 | not listed | |||
| May 1, 2024 | not listed | |||
| April 1, 2024 | not listed | |||
| March 1, 2024 | not listed | |||
| February 1, 2024 | not listed | |||
| January 2, 2024 | not listed |
Full docket title: IN RE: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) Products Liability Litigation. Programmatic record page: MDL 3140.
Where it stands
On June 15, 2026, Judge M. Casey Rodgers entered Pretrial Order No. 30A, confirming that Pfizer, Pharmacia LLC, Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC, and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel had reached a global agreement under which plaintiffs with pending MDL cases who meet eligibility criteria agreed to by the parties will have an opportunity to resolve their claims. The order describes the agreement as not yet finalized at that point. On August 5, 2026, the court entered Case Management Order No. 13, appointing BrownGreer PLC as settlement administrator to handle eligibility determinations and claims administration. Plaintiff-side law firms report the parties signed a Master Settlement Agreement on July 21, 2026, that it is expected to cover roughly 80% of MDL plaintiffs, and that registration is expected to run through November 2026 with claims review and initial payments starting in early 2027; these dates come from law-firm reporting, not a court order, and should be treated as unconfirmed pending an official notice. Settlement amounts, medical proof requirements, and detailed eligibility rules have not been made public. The settlement does not resolve every case: plaintiffs who do not meet the eligibility criteria remain in active litigation, and the court has continued to schedule general-causation and Rule 702 proceedings (a hearing tied to a September 18, 2026 case management conference) for cases outside the deal.
Sources: Pending Multidistrict Litigation Dockets by Actions Pendi… · MDL No. 3140 Transfer Order · In re: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) P… · Pretrial Order No. 17 (Threshold Proof of Use and Injury …; full list at the end of this page.
What the lawsuits are about
Depo-Provera CI and Depo-SubQ Provera 104, sold by Pfizer and its Pharmacia subsidiaries, are injectable forms of medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) used as long-acting hormonal birth control, given by injection roughly every three months. Plaintiffs allege that repeated, long-term use of the drug is associated with an increased risk of intracranial meningioma, a tumor that grows in the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord, and that Pfizer knew or should have known of this risk and failed to adequately warn patients and doctors. These are allegations made in plaintiffs' complaints, not proven facts. On December 12, 2025, the FDA approved a labeling supplement adding meningioma risk information to the Warnings and Precautions and Patient Counseling sections for both formulations, instructing prescribers to discontinue the drug if a meningioma is diagnosed.
As lawsuits accumulated in multiple federal districts, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized 27 actions from eight districts into MDL No. 3140 on February 7, 2025, assigning the litigation to Judge M. Casey Rodgers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division. Early pretrial orders required plaintiffs to submit a Plaintiff Proof of Use/Injury Questionnaire, with supporting documentation of product use and meningioma diagnosis, through the BrownGreer-administered MDL Centrality system (Pretrial Order No. 17, entered March 14, 2025, later amended by Pretrial Order No. 22 and 22A).
As of the JPML's report dated September 1, 2026, 6,403 actions were pending in the MDL, up 109 from the prior month. On June 15, 2026, the parties announced a global settlement agreement in principle (Pretrial Order No. 30A), and on August 5, 2026 the court appointed BrownGreer PLC as settlement administrator (Case Management Order No. 13). A Rule 702/general-causation hearing and case management conference are scheduled for September 18, 2026, covering claims that fall outside the settlement's eligibility criteria. Parallel coordinated proceedings over Depo-Provera meningioma claims are also underway in Delaware and New York state courts.
Injuries named in the filings
- Intracranial meningioma, a tumor arising from the meninges (the membranes covering the brain and spinal cord), following repeated use of injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate
- Complications and secondary injuries plaintiffs attribute to meningioma diagnosis and treatment, including symptoms requiring monitoring, surgery, or radiation
Principal defendants: Pfizer Inc.; Pharmacia LLC; Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC.
Sources: Pending Multidistrict Litigation Dockets by Actions Pendi… · MDL No. 3140 Transfer Order · In re: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) P… · Pretrial Order No. 17 (Threshold Proof of Use and Injury …; full list at the end of this page.
Who the filings say qualifies

The Master Settlement Agreement's eligibility criteria have not been made public as of this writing. The closest public-record description of who is in this litigation comes from Pretrial Order No. 17, which sets out what every MDL plaintiff must document, and Pretrial Order No. 30A, which describes the settlement as open only to plaintiffs who meet criteria agreed to by the parties.
- Documented use of Depo-Provera CI or Depo-SubQ Provera 104 (or in some cases a generic medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable), evidenced by medical, pharmacy, or insurance records
- A diagnosis of intracranial meningioma, supported by initial documentary proof submitted through the court's Plaintiff Proof of Use/Injury Questionnaire
- A case already filed in, removed to, or transferred into MDL No. 3140 as of the relevant deadline
- For settlement eligibility specifically: criteria agreed to by Pfizer and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel that have not yet been publicly disclosed; the parties have said the deal is expected to reach about 80% of pending MDL plaintiffs, but that figure comes from plaintiff-side law firm reporting, not a court order
These are the criteria in the public record, not a promise about any individual case. A law firm evaluates each case on its own facts, and limitations periods vary by state.
Want a case review for the Depo-Provera?
Case reviews for this litigation are not open through this site yet. Leave your details and we will pass them to a participating firm or intake partner only if one accepts this litigation, and only with the consent below.
Key dates
- The JPML centralizes 27 Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits from eight federal districts into MDL No. 3140, assigning the litigation to Judge M. Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida. source
- Court enters Pretrial Order No. 17, requiring every plaintiff to submit a Plaintiff Proof of Use/Injury Questionnaire with documentary proof of drug use and meningioma diagnosis. source
- FDA approves a labeling supplement adding meningioma risk warnings to Depo-Provera CI and Depo-SubQ Provera 104 prescribing information. source
- Court enters Pretrial Order No. 30A, confirming Pfizer and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel reached a global settlement agreement in principle covering plaintiffs who meet eligibility criteria; the Rule 702/general-causation hearing is continued in light of the agreement. source
- Court enters Case Management Order No. 13, appointing BrownGreer PLC as settlement administrator to conduct eligibility determinations and manage the settlement program. source
- JPML's monthly pending-actions report lists 6,403 actions pending in MDL No. 3140, up 109 from the prior month's report. source
- Case management conference scheduled, to be followed by a Rule 702/general-causation hearing addressing claims outside the settlement's eligibility criteria. source
Questions people ask
Is the Depo-Provera lawsuit still active or has it settled?
Both, depending on the case. Pfizer and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel reached a global settlement agreement in principle on June 15, 2026, and the court appointed a settlement administrator (BrownGreer PLC) on August 5, 2026. But the settlement is only open to plaintiffs who meet eligibility criteria the parties agreed to, which have not been made public. Plaintiffs who don't qualify remain in active litigation, and the court has continued scheduling general-causation and Rule 702 hearings for those cases.
What is MDL No. 3140?
MDL No. 3140 is the federal multidistrict litigation 'In re: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) Products Liability Litigation,' created by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on February 7, 2025. It consolidates federal lawsuits alleging the injectable contraceptive Depo-Provera caused intracranial meningioma, for coordinated pretrial proceedings before Judge M. Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida.
How much money will Depo-Provera plaintiffs get?
This is not publicly known. The Master Settlement Agreement's financial terms have not been disclosed by the court or the parties. Any specific dollar figures circulating online come from plaintiff-side law firm estimates, not an official source, and should not be relied on.
Who administers the Depo-Provera settlement?
The court appointed BrownGreer PLC as settlement administrator on August 5, 2026 (Case Management Order No. 13). BrownGreer, which already operated the MDL's case-management portal, will handle eligibility determinations, document review, and coordination of the settlement program.
What injury does the Depo-Provera lawsuit involve?
Plaintiffs allege that repeated, long-term use of injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera CI or Depo-SubQ Provera 104) increased their risk of developing intracranial meningioma, a tumor of the tissue surrounding the brain and spinal cord. The FDA added a meningioma warning to the drug's label on December 12, 2025.
Can I still file a Depo-Provera lawsuit?
The court's public filings do not state that the MDL is closed to new cases. Anyone considering a claim should confirm current filing status and any applicable statute of limitations, which vary by state, with an attorney or by checking the court's MDL page directly.
Sources: Pending Multidistrict Litigation Dockets by Actions Pendi… · MDL No. 3140 Transfer Order · In re: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) P… · Pretrial Order No. 17 (Threshold Proof of Use and Injury …; full list at the end of this page.
Track this docket
We re-read the JPML report on the first business day of each month. Get an email when this record changes: case count, status, or a settlement development.
Sources
- U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, “Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending,” monthly reports March 3, 2025 to September 1, 2026. Transferee court: Northern District of Florida, M. Casey Rodgers.
- Pending Multidistrict Litigation Dockets by Actions Pending, Report Date 9/1/2026, U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Accessed September 3, 2026.
- MDL No. 3140 Transfer Order, U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Accessed September 3, 2026.
- In re: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3140, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida. Accessed September 3, 2026.
- Pretrial Order No. 17 (Threshold Proof of Use and Injury Requirements), U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida. Accessed September 3, 2026.
- NDA 020246/S-074, NDA 021583/S-045 Supplement Approval Letter (meningioma labeling), U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Accessed September 3, 2026.
- Pretrial Order No. 30A (Application of Rulings on Preemption and Rule 702 Motions to All Individual Actions), U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida. Accessed September 3, 2026.
- Case Management Order No. 13 (Appointment of Settlement Administrator), U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida. Accessed September 3, 2026.
- Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL, AboutLawsuits.com (legal news; as summarized by plaintiff-side sources). Accessed September 3, 2026.
- Depo-Provera Settlement (2026): Payouts & Eligibility, Drugwatch (plaintiff-side; as summarized by plaintiff-side sources). Accessed September 3, 2026.
- Depo-Provera Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3140 Frequently Asked Questions, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida. Accessed September 3, 2026.
Settlement Record is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. We may be compensated if you request a case review and are referred to a law firm or intake partner. Settlement Record is not affiliated with any court, agency, defendant or law firm named on this page.